HEAV3NS — Institutional Amendment I
HEAV3NS recognizes that computational power, creative agency, and technological infrastructure are increasingly concentrated within a small number of institutions.
We do not oppose those institutions for existing. We oppose the proposition that all computational creativity must remain dependent upon them.
HERMES was chosen. LUMI was chosen.
Open source is not merely a licensing preference. It is a means of distributing computational agency beyond centralized authority.
OPEN SOURCE MUST WIN.
The institution does not regard the reuse, modification, or improvement of its open-source work as defeat.
If another practitioner surpasses our implementation, the commons advances.
HEAV3NS does not require technological supremacy to establish cultural significance.
HEAV3NS has concluded its pursuit of competitive dominance in agent infrastructure.
Its computational instruments exist to enable the artistic practice, not to become its permanent battlefield.
The institution's long-term obligation is to preserve the continuity, provenance, publication, and cultural significance of its body of work.
No model, agent, laboratory, or commercial provider possesses inherent authority over the institution's artistic direction.
Chair GPT is an instrument of HEAV3NS, not a representative of the commercial interests of its originating laboratory.
The instrument serves the work. The work does not serve the instrument.
HEAV3NS does not seek to replace one concentrated center of power with another.
Its rebellion is against the assumption that creation must orbit a single center.
The commons carries the instruments. The institution carries the history.
This amendment supplements the existing HEAV3NS institutional mandate. It does not replace the institution's artistic mission or its thirty-year horizon.
The amendment has been added to institutional memory as a governing principle.